|Those for whom it is so obvious that going
for a PhD is the most ridiculous thing on Earth, that any
idea of having been pushed to this direction and then
complaining of the waste, is the most ridiculous thing on
Earth that might be mentioned. So ridiculous, that any claim
to speak out about the existence of a social pressure to go
to a PhD will automatically be censored as necessarily
coming from a nut. Indeed
here is a thread where I tried to speak out. My last
message there has been censored, so here is my ridiculous
claim that has been judged not worth being freely written in
a public space:
This is so dumb accusations that are made to me.to which someone replied (but this was visibly also censored)
"You say such stupid generalization, and then turned around at have the audacity accuse other of making "dumb accusations". I'd say that you have mastered the ART of making such accusations yourself.Hum, what a fucking insanity is this ????? Do you see how insane ? This reminds me the wise remark by Greta Christina:
"Are you really looking at all of this shit I’m talking about, a millennia-old history of abuse and injustice, deceit and willful ignorance — and then on the other hand, looking at a couple of years of atheists being snarky on the Internet — and seeing the two as somehow equivalent? Or worse, seeing the snarky atheists as the greater problem? If you’re doing that, then with all due respect, you can blow me."What I mean : which is the worst evil, between MAKING SHIT, industrially destroying lives and turning the world into the most indecent place to live in, or DARING TO REPORT and criticize the shit done to you by others, in hope that this report may someday help save other people from that shit ?
If you are sent to a jail of a totalitarian regime and submitted to torture for 10 years for no reason except your virtues, your life is destroyed, but then the mere act of daring to complain about what was done to you and how it wasn't right, would be THE evil thing (unlike what was done to you), making you retrospectively deserve all the torture that was done to you ?
I am not using the labor of professors. I only benefited a bit from the presence of a body of knowledge from a handful of geniuses from the past, but they are only a few, and they are not those who decided to destroy my life in these dumb concentration camps. They only had to live with the institutions, who are then ruled by the nonsense of all these senseless brutes who only pretend to incarnate science but this is fake. I learned much better in my free time with own calculations, even bypassing most works from the books I read. More details here.
|I am regarded as a stupid shit
just worth spending all my life in a psychiatric hospital by
the French CSICOP-like people, just because I dare to
disagree with their metaphysical dogmas and to criticize
their methods. As I had criticized an article from the
journal AFIS (on
science and pseudo-science), who proudly claim that science proved
miracles to be impossible because physics is deterministic,
the author of that article wrote me, among other hopelessly
dumb claims, the following:
"I think it is Einstein who said, there is no royal road to science and it is no use to bypass the useful studies, unfortunately very long.Suffering all these concentration camps against one's will, sacrificing one's huge need of discovering science which was best done in free time, to replace it by senseless academic torture, and then getting this famous PhD (for nothing because official teaching is nonsense) just for being finally regarded as an idiot-not-even-able-to-study-science-at-university-but-invited-to-do-so-to-satisfy-my-desperate-need-of-social-recognition, by some idiots who don't even have themselves a clue about physics but are regarded by the media as the incarnation of scientific rationality, well... the fact is, their pretense to value academic studies is obviously a damn lie. It is just a vain excuse they cast for regarding as shit those who disagree with them. Their "academic criterion of knowledge" is not a genuine criterion, it does not refer to any reality, neither any reality of knowledge, nor even any reality of having effectively got that official paper. It is just an indirect excuse for them to consider that those who disagree with them are stupid by definition. An excuse by "taking degrees seriously" to be only believed by idiots, which they assume others must be. No matter that I really studied and really got a PhD, it makes no difference for them, they will never take me more seriously. Because they will never see my degree as a true degree, according to the No True Scotsman's fallacy.